1/7/21

Venezuela as Iran's Latin American ally

 

The selection of the ultra-conservative Ebrahim Raisi as the new president will strengthen the Islamic Republic's alliance with revolutionary governments around the world, such as Venezuela.

Iran has had mostly cordial relations with Venezuela for many decades. However, relations soared to their highest level during Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s presidency. Ideological alignment between Ahmadinejad and the then-president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, paved the way for developing diplomatic and economic relations between Iran and Latin American countries ever since. Other left-leaning governments in the region, such as Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Uruguay, also expanded their ties with Iran in the 2005-2013 period.

Iran’s foreign policy and, by extension, its priorities started to change in 2013, albeit for a brief period. Based on his presidential campaign promises, Hassan Rouhani made an effort to de-escalate tensions with the United States and improve business ties with European and Asian (especially Middle Eastern) countries. The more “liberal” approach under Rouhani made high level of trade exchange possible with countries that are not politically aligned with Iran. Trade with Brazil, as Iran’s top trading partner in Latin America, for example, continued under the right-wing government of President Jair Bolsonaro (since 2018). Another example is Chile. Tehran and the government of Santiago headed by the former president Michelle Bachelet, re-established full diplomatic relations after 36 years in 2016, signalling Iran's attempt to have expanded and balanced relations with more Latin American countries.

With the reimposition of sanctions by the United States starting in 2017, strategic relations between Iran and Venezuela have once again became prominent. Moroever, Iran’s political relations with Cuba have remained friendly for decades. Iran's policy in the coming years will be a strong continuity of this alignment.

 

Venezuela at the core of Iran's economic relations with Latin American countries

In the first week after the presidential elections in Iran, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Cuban Miguel Díaz-Canel and Bolivian Luis Arce were the only Latin American presidents who congratulated Ebrahim Raisi. Such a position is linked to the history of relationship between Iran and these countries. During the last two decades, Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia plus Nicaragua are the countries in Latin America that have had high-level interactions leveraged by public sectors on both sides. Taking into consideration the diversification of cooperation, Venezuela undoubtedly is a special case among all Latin American and Caribbean countries.

The volume of investments by Iran’s manufacturing sector in Venezuela began to spike in 2005 and economic ties were mainly based on long-term infrastructure development projects. This was mainly a result of the relatively good and stable economic situation in both Iran and Venezuela.

In the decade that followed, Iran’s investments in Venezuela appeared in the form of establishing joint construction companies (such as Kayson) and oil companies (such as Sadra). The transfer of technology, particularly in the field of agroindustry, was another field of cooperation. In addition, Iran and Venezuela established joint companies to manufacture tractors and automobiles, including Veniran Tractor and Venirauto- the latter is an assembly line of Iran Khodro’s Samand cars, branded as Centauro locally. At a smaller scale, Iran also tapped into the energy and machinery sectors in Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Ecuador.

Iran has mostly been investing and exporting engineering services to Venezuela. In 2013, for example, the Iranian Association of Engineering and Technical Services Exporters (ICCA) estimated that the aggregate Iranian engineering services in Venezuela exceeded $8.3 billion. The high number of construction projects often require substantial financial capital and transaction channels; thus, the Iran-Venezuela Bilateral Bank (IVBB) was established in 2010 to finance the joint projects.

Having a presence in Venezuela’s engineering service sector made it slightly easier for Iran to get back its payments in the 2000s. However, the investment climate did not last long. With economic troubles mounting in Venezuela starting in 2014, many projects practically failed. As a result, collaboration was mainly focused on the processed food and pharmaceutical industries and revitalising Venezuelan farmlands to export some agricultural goods to Iran. Simultaneously, economic cooepration between Tehran and Havana have been mainly focused on the pharmaceutical biotechnology.

The U.S.-imposed embargo on Venezuela’s state-owned oil company led to the withdrawal of foreign companies, impacting whole Venezuela´s hydrocarbon industry since 2020. As a result, Venezuela's gasoline production fell dramatically, and its economy took a further downturn hit. The multiple Iranian fuel shipment to Venezuela was a successful attempt to maintain vital mobility in Venezuela amid the pandemic, despite external threats and differences in octane standards.

While the Covid-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on trade globally, Iran’s economic interaction with Venezuela sharply increased in 2020. In July 2020, an Iranian supermarket chain opened in Venezuela. Megasis, a supermarket valued at $10 million, represents an example of renewed cooperation between the Venezuelan and Iranian food sectors. The products at the supermarket are priced in foreign currencies, in accordance with the 2019 policy by Venezuela's Central Bank.

Lack of resources has persuaded Venezuela to swap gold, jet fuel, and agricultural goods in exchange for engineering services, shipping derivatives, and fuel from Iran. Such types of business relations during Ruhani administration was not expected to be a sustainable trade mechanism or solve the deep economic issues that Venezuela or Iran are facing. First and foremost, these actions were meant to showcase free their resistance to sanctions. The arms trade is the new field that we can observe from now on.

Neither Caracas nor Tehran, as two old OPEC founders, no longer get access to significant oil revenues as they did in the past decades. Furthermore, economic sanctions and the crisis in both countries may slow down bilateral projects. However, the entire trajectory show even though a part of sanctions against “revolutionary” governments in Tehran, Caracas and even Havana are finally lifted, they will likely remain close allies in next few years.

 

30/10/20

How is Iran's pharmaceutical market structure?

 

 

 

 Credit: AFP

 

The recent establishment of Insulin production line in Iran by the Danish company Novonordisk amid the U.S. sanctions has highlighted the importance of reviewing the Iranian pharmaceutical sector. Generally, the growth of the pharmaceutical industry and market in Iran during the last decades is attributed to various factors; such as applying industrial and trade policies, currency revenues by exporting of raw materials and manufactured goods, population growth and changes in pharmaceutical expenditures that correlate with income per capita.

Liberalising reforms under a mixed public-private system since the 1990s, and article 44 of the constitution aimed to promote market competition, which is commonly identified by key characteristics such as lowering barriers to entry, increasing the number of sellers and decreasing the concentration, and product and price differentiation. Since then, in proportion to the increase in international trade, the import of high-cost patented products and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) began to increase. 

28/1/20

Global tourism situation in 2019 with reference to the Middle East

FITUR 2020, Madrid - Spain



From January 22 to 26, 2020, Madrid-España became the centre of the meeting and exhibition of leading tourism companies from 170 countries. The tourism fair or FITUR is held every year, and the 2020 event was a benchmark of previous achievements and experiences of the participating countries.
Making a comparison requires a statistical mentality. The 2019 Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report prepared by the World Economic Forum (WEF) clarifies and details the situation and ranking of 140 countries in the world according to influencing
factors on tourism competitiveness. As can also be seen in the report, countries that have a strong combination of economic development and infrastructure, public diplomacy and particular attractiveness, are positioned at the top of the list.

The general ranking consists of a combination of a series of indicators that are analyzed and classified one by one. In this regard, we can name a broad range of indicators such as Business Environment, Price Competitiveness, Security and Safety, Environmental Sustainability, Health, Air Infrastructure, Human and Labour Market, Marine and Land Infrastructure, Telecommunications, Natural Resources, International Openness and Cultural Heritage...


The Middle East countries in this report demonstrate different results, both positive and negative points. Some countries such as the United Arab Emirates (33/140) and Israel (57/140) have managed to obtain a good position, while countries such as Iran (89/140) and Jordan (84/140) are reported to have a mixed and intermediate result, and Yemen (140 / 140) as a failed state and submerged in war is in the last position of the list.
As proof, I have compared 4 countries of Iran, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Lebanon according to 6 indicators that I think are more important. Individual results are classified as 1 as the minor and 7 as the maximum point.






The comparison of these countries leads us to the following conclusions:


- Although Iran's Infrastructures for international tourism are defective and obsolete due to the effect of the sanctions, however, that country offers very competitive prices that can be advantageous for specific low-cost travellers.
-The four countries of this chart, especially Oman, have had improvements in providing security for foreign tourists, which makes us deny that the Middle East is a necessarily insecure region.
- Unlike expectations, these countries gain intermediate-good levels in health and hygiene. This indicator is important for travellers since health risk is a potential reason to think twice before stepping on tourist destinations.
-By the way, these countries have not worked enough to open outwards, and this indicator confirms this. As long as local institutions do not adopt a solid international approach that provides an attractive environment for foreign tourists who have different cultures, the full potential cannot be exploited.




29/3/18

A new welfare state model?


The recent public opinion considers essential the public policies to development and education, health and pension guarantee. My impression is that there will be new tendencies to welfare state model in Western Europe, which is highly influential for other countries/regions and the world economy entirely.
By expanding of industrial development, the welfare state -being inspired by Keynesian economics after WWII[1]- has worked as a response to modernization and “emergence of an industrial working class”.[2] From a point of view, “The welfare state is an essential institution in any modern society[3] even thought different models under market economy pressure have had different results. The universal model (equality-oriented) which has been implemented in Nordic Countries, has generally considered more successful in reducing Gini and mitigating poverty, than liberal and corporatist models. Even so after financial crisis in 2009 the welfare state in many of developed countries faced challenge of employment deterioration and difficulties to social expenditures, in the way that the most victims have been the poor inhabitants and minority groups.[4] . As Stiglitz believes, the market failures reminds us “the markets are not efficient” and “have failed to provide insurance against unemployment and disability, and again the welfare state and public policy stepped in[5].However the big Challenge in the future of the integrated global markets is the sustainability of investment in human resource to fight squalor, ignorance and disease[6] among others. Demographic aging by 2050, technology and automation, the “dramatic increase in women’s labor force participation” and “market labor saturation” affect the new welfare state model.[7] According to Minouche Shafik, “universal basic income transfers money to people who are not poor[8] and as it was concluded during another event at LSE, “richness is a bigger challenge than giant of poverty for achieving equality[9], in other words by implementing the new politics based on richness control and then wealth redistribution, the poverty will be eradicated more efficient. 
Now in the twenty-first century, developing countries are exposure to globalisation challenges too because of the inward FDI, industrialisation cooperation with OECD countries and debt issues. The new welfare state model in North can affect on South system tactation and other elements of economics structure in the long-term. 



[1] De Regil. Alvaro (2001), Keynesian Economics and The Welfare State, p.3
[2] Andersen. Jørgen Goul (2012), Welfare States and Welfare State Theory, p.5
[3] Ibid., p.4
[4] Lindbeck. Assar (2006), The Welfare State: Background, Achievements, Problems, p.18
[5] Stiglitz. Joseph (2015), The Welfare State in the Twenty First Century, p.3-13
[6] William Beveridge (1942), Beveridge Report: Social Insurance and Allied Services
[7] Myles. John, Quadagno. Jill (2002), Political Theories of the Welfare State, p.51
[8] Shafik. Minouche, LSE Events: Beveridge 2.0 - Rethinking the Welfare State for the 21st Century. Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtpQ_bLQE4k    (min. 27)
[9] LSE Festival 2018, The Challenge of Richness? Rethinking the Giant of Poverty. Available on:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/website-archive/newsAndMedia/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=3996

20/9/17

La escasez de agua a nivel mundial debería tener lugar de discusión en la Asamblea General de la ONU




Comienza la septuagésima segunda Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas mientras la humanidad necesita una solidaridad y cooperación jamás hecho para resolver los problemas en su entorno. Uno de los problemas que tarde o temprano en el caso de no buscar remedios podría tener costes irreversibles es el problema medioambiental. Tanto en la Declaración del Milenio como en los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible, el acceso al agua potable es un importante eje en el nuevo siglo. Mientras tanto los nuevos hallazgos y signos demuestran otra cosa, los recursos hídricos se encuentran en su peor situación en su historia empeorando cada vez, lo que puede llevar el mundo a una guerra del agua. 

El Instituto Mundial de Recursos (WTI) con sede en Washington, en uno de sus informes más recientes, ha listado el ranking de los países que tendrán el mayor escasez de agua hasta 2040. De acuerdo con las estadísticas de WTI, en esta lista podemos ver los países que tendrán el mayor problema con escasez de agua potable hasta en 2 décadas. Si el número de índice se acerca más a la cifra 5, significa que el país enfrenta o enfrentará con mayor gravedad la escasez de agua potable. 

Curiosamente una buena parte de esta lista está integrada por los países de Asia Central, Asia Occidental (lo que está nominado por error Medio Oriente) y Norte de África. Esto significa que a diferencia del siglo XX y adelante que los recursos petroleros podía desencadenar algunos conflictos, esta vez es el agua que puede provocar tensiones con consecuencias a nivel mundial. ¡Agua es el nuevo petróleo! La escasez de agua dulce puede obstaculizar o incluso colapsar las economías menos industrializadas y surgir problemas para los países en desarrollo que están altamente dependientes a las actividades agrarias tradicionales. Las consecuencias más previstas de este colapso pudieran consistir en la disminución intensa del índice del desarrollo humano y un boom migratorio hacia países con menor vulnerabilidad de recursos esenciales. 

Mientras Irán se ubica como décimo tercero país a nivel mundial con más sufrimiento de la escasez de los recursos hídricos, cuyas reservas llegan a 89 mil millones de metros cúbicos (la mitad del siglo pasado), necesita medidas coherentes y cooperación internacional para evitar el colapso. El milenario río Karoon y el lago Urumye también se encuentran en situaciones graves y no han podido revitalizarse satisfactoriamente hasta el momento. 

Es necesario que los jefes de estados que se reúnen desde hoy en la Asamblea General, enfatizan en los ODM, ODS y el acuerdo climático de París y reiteren las alertas sobre el agua. Probablemente la cooperación internacional a largo plazo, utilizar las nuevas técnicas y tecnologías utilizando los recursos humanos cualificados pueda ser efectivo en este ámbito. 

My message to world leaders today: only together, as truly United Nations, can we build a peaceful world and advance human dignity for all... My top priority for United Nations General Assembly is finding ways to end the world's conflicts.
                                                                      António Guterres, 72th General Assembly of the UN